Difficult: I got lost on the proof of Lemma 3.1.5.5. It just keeps going and I don't think I get the very first part quite well enough to follow it through. I also don't understand why in Lemma 3.1.5.1 we need primes that are congruent to 1 mod 4 in the first part.
Reflective: It is interesting to see some proofs of specific cases, but I would rather just get straight into seeing the main proof.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment